Definition of Europe in the 21st Century

Definition of atomic number 63 in the 21st snow europium is rabbleed from Kalingrad in the North, to the Caucasus and primal Asia, to the Balkans by an arc of danger and instability. (EU Commissi one and only(a)r for external relations Christopher Patten, July 2001).Does this mean that at the look time europium and the European be one and the uniform thing?IntroductionThe European or EU citizen is at the present time becoming synonymous with the definition of the point to where the continent of Europe extends. This seems to be the case with the present reaction to en orotundment and the focus on criminal offense from outside the borders of the EU and the fears of crime from the saucily integrated countries and from those countries that ring the EU. Enlargement go forth illustrate the new tiered system in the EU, the newly ascended countries from post-Communist countries, which atomic number 18 viewed as not truly European. Therefore this intervention pass on illustrate how the definition of what Europe is in the 21st Century has been narrowed from the expanse of the European continent to the membership of the EU whereby countries are aiming to join this governmental unit in order to gain legitimacy inwardly the global political and economic structure.Enlargement A exemplar Study of a Narrow Definition of EuropeEnlargement of the EU is a mixed blessing, because on one hand it is helping to fulfil a status of stability and cohesiveness throughout the region. On the different hand, at that place are concerns that in making the Union larger will in fact de-stabilize the region. This is due to prejudice of certain groups which would acquit bounteous access in the region, one such group are the capital of Italy Gypsy migrants from Slovakia. In the past few months the newspapers excite displayed the concerns of the British earthly concern and politicians about these migrants when the nation joins the EU. Therefore this introduces the questio n whether the EU really respect the integrity of cultural difference? Other problems include the possible de-stabilizing of the prudence by incorporating smaller, less affluent countries marginal and war torn countries and transitional countries. These countries could also cause the EU problems in regard to its unique commence of ensuring cohesiveness by using the observe of fairness, because if the EU gets too large it may not be possible any longer to batten its political and legal stability. Therefore the consistency and coherence that the rule of law ensures is no longer apparent due to the sheer size of the Union. other problem lies in the fact that smaller nations may not pick out the legal, political and economic clout to ensure that their agenda is considered. Although previously it has been mentioned that the EUs rule of law acts as a check and balance to more almighty nations, in truth the original countries in the EU were mainly ex-colonial empires. The newer nat ions that are joining the EU are akin to colonies of a colonial power, consequently there is an inherent imbalance in the Union.However in rejoinder to the negative effects of the possible de-stabilization of the region, one must consider that in order to join the Union each nation must consecrate fulfilled the Copenhagen Criteria. This criterion states that each joining nation must be Be a stable democracy, respecting human rights, the rule of law, and the protection of minorities have a functioning market economy adopt the common rules, standards and policies that unsex up the body of EU law. The EU paints a very dotty picture of enlargement, where the only outcome of enlargement is beneficial. In truth this is a very lopsided picture because of the public outcry against the possible in-migration into the original EU states. This can be seen in the article by Cathy Newman in the Financial Times Britain will throw open its doors to browseers from the agent communist countrie s joining the European Union on May 1, only if those that refuse to get a job will be denied benefits and propel out, the government has pledged Tony Blair after months of shortenure from the Tories and the right wing press over fears of an influx of immigrants from the former Soviet bloc vowed If they cant assume themselves, they will be put out of the country. This article illustrates the problems that have drawred within one nation over the policy of enlargement. Although the enlargement is supposed to introduce together the European region, the public opinion of at least one EU nation is resisting the expansion, in relation to economic migrants migrants which the nation has traditionally refused asylum applications. However these fears may be unfounded because as Kraus Schwager press that increased migration from East to West EU countries would only occur below the fear of rejection to Union membership. In fact they argue that the EUs expansion will have a beneficia l effect on the economy of these smaller nations and this will result in a boost of their economies and job market, consequently reducing the amount of migrants from East to West. The conclusion of their article they state that polity makers who are, for whatever reason, reluctant to accept large numbers of immigrants should not smelling troubled with enlargement. On the contrary, the prospect of joining the EU may intimately reduce in-migration. The economic and social benefits which probably accrue to easterly Europe from entry should be presented as a means to reducing the incentives to emigrate. Policies which conjure convergence of income levels in eastern and Western Europe, such as the ingrained market and, possibly, Structural Funds should be promoted. .. In this process, diverging interests of major(ip) EU members have created substantial uncertainty about the date and conditions of accession. It is quite plausible that such uncertainty has raised the fear among pot ential migrants that accession may fail or be postponed for a long time. harmonize to our result, this may have increased immediate immigration. Thus, if immigration is not desirable, for proximo accession rounds a straightforward and predictable negotiation process is to be recommended. Hence Kraus Schwager argue that the fears of the right, which have been fed to the public through the media, concerning immigration from the East that will de-stabilize the economy, have no straddle. This is because the possible migrants would prefer to gruntle in their homeland with a stronger and growing economy rather than excise to another nation. However, although these fears may be unfounded the resistance to these new citizens from the Eastern Europe illustrates the possible de-stabilization of the EU politically. In addition to this it causes problems legally because the tush and the uniqueness of the EU lies within the rule of law and one of the virtually important laws that is upheld is the Free Movement of EU Citizens, which includes their ability to trade, reside and cash in ones chips in part of the EU. Yet, the accession of the new Eastern European nations has herald blocks to this ability by many of the original and major EU players. In the UK it has caused a debate because the government was going to allow a reconcile movement of possible immigrants but this has been resisted by the right, as well as members of the public. This is illustrated by the arguments of Michael Howard, leader of the traditionalist Party Mr Howard, seeking to make political capital out of Labours discomfort on the issue, will accuse the organization of complacency over the implications of the EUs expansion in May. This comes as the Government sought-after(a) to play down fears that Britain would be flooded by migrants seeking work in more prosperous parts of the EU. During a high-profile visit to Burnley, the movie of race riots in2001, Mr Howard will demand that Britain cop y the transitional arrangements adopted by Germany and France to prevent citizens from new EU members from working there. Mr Howard will say The Conservative Party has always supported the enlargement of the EU to take in the former communist countries of Eastern Europe. We continue to do so. But he will continue Almost every other country in the EU has quite rightly taken the precaution of putting in place transitional arrangements to deal with immigration from the accession countries. It is still not too late for the British Government to put in place transitional arrangements as well. If we were in government, we would do so. The Government has approached this problem in typical fashion. First it failed to address it, then it ignored it, now it is claiming to brass section up to it. In short the cohesiveness that the EU has claimed will occur with the enlargement has not happened in the expected manner. Ever since enlargement there have been a greater amount of problems combati ng organized crime, because of decreased security, corruption of public officials in favour of organized crime groups in the newly acceded nations and the breaches of human rights in arrests. Therefore this creates problems for combating organized crime with either prisoners world let off on technicalities, the vastness of places to hide decreasing the authority of policing or the police not interested in fighting organized crime. Kennedy has commented that the EU is committed to justly and fairly fighting organized crime within the realms of human rights and arbiter however its weakness is that it relies only on specific domestic member state tidings We are creation told that Europol and Eurojust the new European body to strengthen collaboration between justice ministries and prosecution services- will only act on specific intelligence. This is to imprecate on the integrity of the state and its officials It also means relying on the intelligence of other countries and, as I have said before, we have no idea about how this may be collected and by what standards. jurist does not permit shortcuts, but governments will readily pursue degraded and dirty solutions to problems if not kept under scrutiny. Therefore by stringently relying on only specific intelligence this will reduce the intensity level of the fight against organized crime, especially when there is the added problem of corrupt post-communist regimes that have joined the EU after enlargement whereby the dependable European, i.e. the EU citizen inevitably to be protected especially those original member states which define the true Europe.